Editorial Note | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2578-8949/032
*Corresponding Author: Hayden Wyatt, Department of Dermatology, Division of Immunology and Rheumatology, USA.
Citation: Hayden Wyatt, The Clinical Manifestation of Childhood Systemic Lupus Erythematous. J .Dermatology and Dermatitis. Doi: 10.31579/2578-8949/032
Copyright: © 2018 Hayden Wyatt. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 06 April 2018 | Accepted: 30 April 2018 | Published: 05 May 2018
Keywords: childhood; complement; c-reactive protein; malar rash; systemic lupus erythematosus
The clinical manifestation of childhood systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is similar to that of adult SLE; however, the former tends to be more severe and more aggressive than the latter. The prevalence of malar rash in SLE patients was reported to be 50% to 60%, and the rash may sometimes mimic sunburn erythema, as in our patient; thus, the underlying disease may be misdiagnosed in certain cases.
The clinical manifestation of childhood systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is similar to that of adult SLE; however, the former tends to be more severe and more aggressive than the latter. The malar rash in SLE patients may sometimes mimic sunburn erythema, as in our patient; thus, the underlying disease may be misdiagnosed in certain cases.
A previously healthy 12-year-old Japanese girl presented to our outpatient clinic with a rash in early September. She had been well except for easy fatigability and not had an excessive sun exposure. Her physician administered a topical ointment (hydrocortisone butyrate) as treatment for sunburn erythema on the face and an antihistaminergic drug (10mg/ day of bepotastine besilate ) for urticaria on the trunk and extremities for two weeks. Physical examination revealed a flat, brownish rash on the cheeks and nasal bridge (Figure 1), and an itchy erythematous rash on the trunk and extensor surfaces of the extremities (Figure 2); however, no lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly, or arthritis was noted.
In addition, chest auscultation revealed normal breath sounds. The laboratory findings were as follows: white blood cell count, 3,200/μL with 34% lymphocytes; hemoglobin level, 11.8 g/dL; platelet count, 17.2 × 104/μL; aspartate aminotransferase level, 67 IU/L; alanine aminotransferase level, 69 IU/L; lactate dehydrogenase level, 400 IU/L; C-reactive protein (CRP) level, 0.02 mg/dL; ferritin level, 117.8 ng/mL; immunoglobulin G level, 3,120 mg/dL; erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), 120 mm/h; complement (C) 3 level, 34 mg/dL (reference range, 77–195 mg/dL) ; C4 level, 1 mg/dL (reference range, 7–40 mg/dL); anti-nuclear antibody titer, 320× with a speckled pattern; and anti-dsDNA antibody level, 124.5 IU/mL (reference range, <10 IU/mL). On urinalysis, protein (2+) with cellular casts was found. Based on these results, we diagnosed the patient with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), because of the presence of 5 of the 11 criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1997 revised classification criteria for SLE [1]. Histopathological examination by a renal biopsy revealed class IV nephritis according to the World Health Organization classification (diffuse proliferative glomerulonephritis affecting >50% of glomeruli) [2]. After the diagnosis, she was treated with 40 mg/day of prednisolone and 150 mg/day of mizoribine and the disease had been controlled well.
Childhood-onset SLE is rare, with an estimated incidence rate of <1 case per 100,000 children. The clinical manifestation of childhood SLE is similar to that of adult SLE; however, the former tends to be more severe and more aggressive than the latter [3]. The prevalence of malar rash in SLE patients was reported to be 50% to 60%. In the literature, malar rash is typically described as a slightly raised, bright, erythematous rash on the light-exposed areas of the face (the "butterfly" area). However, the rash may sometimes mimic sunburn erythema [4], as in our patient; thus, the underlying disease may be misdiagnosed in certain cases. In addition to the ACR criteria, low serum complement levels and elevated ESRs with normal CRP levels could be helpful in the diagnosis of SLE [5].
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,